Billy Wilder: An Auteur?
Billy Wilder: Auteur or just an author?
To understand if Wilder ticks off the boxes for the complicated job that is auteurship, we must define what being an auteur entails. First and foremost, auteurs tend to be characterised by their distinctive styles, being instantly recognisable by a familiar audience. This is usually achieved by a stylistic synthesis of colour, lighting, mise-en-scene for a consistent visual appearance, along with characters and themes that are similar throughout an auteur's filmography. An example of this would be Wes Anderson who's use of bright colours, symmetry and characters who don't act their age makes each of his films instantly recognisable. Recurring actors, cinematographers and composers help an auteur keep consistent.
Wilder can be seen as an auteur in some ways but not others. When comparing Sunset Boulevard and Some Like It Hot - arguably his two defining films - there is a clear difference in tone, lighting and style. However, each is distinctively Wilder for other reasons. Firstly, characters act similar within both films, defined with mental health issues, passive acceptance to their current situation (Joe staying in the mansion in Sunset Boulevard or Joe and Gerald staying in drag in Some Like It Hot). Wilder's auteurship status is also defined through his recurring and consistent themes which pushed against the zeitgeist of the time. Whether it be Sunset Boulevard critiquing the film industry or Some Like It Hot discussing issues of representation of sexuality and gender, Wilder is more than happy to push these ideas into the mainstream where his contemporaries wouldn't.
Of course, if auteurship is defined by a complete spectrum of consistency and filmmaking identity, then Wilder falls short in certain areas, however, exploring different genres shouldn't detract from a filmmakers creative integrity and I think that Wilder is the definition of an auteur.
Daniel, you offer an engaging, well-written and informed piece which is focused on the theme at hand. The ideas are relevant, wide ranging and clearly examined as you take the reader through the individual points. In order to further improve the scope of your work I would like you to select at least one sequence from each film studied and then to use the sequences to examine the question.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your efforts.